2021-02-24 Meeting notes
Date
Feb 24, 2021
Participants
@Carmen Mitchell
@David Walker
@Daina Dickman (Unlicensed)
@Lana Wood (Unlicensed)
@Lia Ryland (Unlicensed)
@Mark Bilby (Unlicensed) (note taker)
@Mark Stover (Unlicensed)
@Melissa Seelye (Unlicensed) (guest)
Not in attendance
@Alyssa Loera (Unlicensed)
Discussion topics
Time | Item | Presenter | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
5 minutes | DigRepo Annual meeting planning update | @Carmen Mitchell | CFP and Form should be ready to go! Sending it out on Monday the 22nd. |
5 minutes | DAWG Update | Provided as written by Alyssa |
|
10 minutes | Researcher Database | @Mark Bilby (Unlicensed) | https://metadata.libraries.psu.edu/ |
10 minutes | Repository withdrawals policy/guidelines | @Lana Wood (Unlicensed) | Draft of CSU East Bay policy. CSUEB has created a survey for users for take-downs of previously deposited content. They have created a Withdrawal Policy, which represents their chain of command. Other campuses are welcome to repurpose this policy and workflow. |
10 minutes | User deletions | @Lana Wood (Unlicensed) and @Carmen Mitchell | Can end users delete uploads to the system? Need to balance concerns about preserving scholarly record vs. occasional ability to delete items on request. On technical side, deletions in Fedora do actually disappear/overwrite content, though Amazon Glacier backup may allow for retrieval of past content. Lana and Carmen both recommend preservation (not allowing user deletions) as default. Committee reached consensus approval of this and forwarding it to COLD for approval. |
10 minutes | Workform categories | @Lia Ryland (Unlicensed) and @Melissa Seelye (Unlicensed) | From the Metadata Working Group: Could have descriptions and examples of what might go into each category. Problem of workform bloat; don’t want a workform for each type. Genre already provides way of granular faceting. Important to keep forms as simple as possible. Proposing matching landing page categories and workforms as follows: Theses/Dissertations and Student Projects (2 workforms)
|
(move to next month if out of time | Branding: local vs systemwide | @Mark Bilby (Unlicensed) | ABIERTA local brand for example. Developed local branding for Fullerton. Not sure if they are supposed to use local branding or not. Can local branding co-exist with CSU-wide branding? Dave says that this can happen. Authentication can lead users on each campus to a different landing/splash page. May add instructions in the training section about how to add custom branding. |