| | | |
---|
15 minutes | Feature development prioritization | @David Walker and @Carmen Mitchell | |
10 minutes | Datacite Integration | @Mark Bilby (Unlicensed) | From the 12-17-2019 meeting notes: There was a previously a STIM report on Handles & DOIs A rationale for Handles (mandatory) + DOIs (optional) Some are very interested in DOIs Would COLD want one linked open data membership to consider when determining funding possibilities? Or pieced apart by service? Arguments for keeping it pieced apart: offers the ability to prioritize pieces and pay by piece, rather than one large cost Some campuses are already using CrossRef; We have a centralized CrossRef membership at the CO level; Dave would consider integrating into Samvera but needs to review what the integration looks like (CrossRef seems more complex than DataCite) Need plan or guidelines for what gets a DOI and what doesn’t (some faculty works already have them); This is also dependent on the integration, might need to customize to not mint DOIs for every item Do we have a sense of other IRs and if they are minting DOIs for ETDs? As opposed to pulling in existing DOIs for things like faculty articles; ETDs likely don’t live anywhere else and we do want to point to them, in perpetuity. We have reliable stats on ETDs and could use that data to predict yearly costs for DOI minting; At times DOIs are not minted in order to keep metadata proprietary (behind paywalled databases) Need more understanding of integration, will work out possibilities with Dave over email Will vote to move forward over email, as well
|
10 minutes | ORCID integration | @Mark Bilby (Unlicensed) | Vote to move forward to COLD for funding? Was discussed/will continue to be discussed at Schol Comm meeting |
10 minutes | | @Mark Bilby (Unlicensed) | Vote to move forward to COLD for funding? Free service, could work to build out further customization with Montana State Does automatic checking of versions, author rights, journal archiving policies; Expedites pre-print archiving process for authors At Montana State goal is for authors to submit at Shareyourpaper.org which then pushes to local IR Reliant on OAI-PMH enhancement Before implementing, should be discussed with project managers
|
10 minutes | Working group updates | @Alyssa Loera (Unlicensed) @Lia Ryland (Unlicensed) | DAWG: Completed a lot of open tasks. Self-evaluation toolkit is being filled out by members. Sending to other campuses by mid-fall. Digital preservation research going on. Using archivematica. Using NDSA tiered approach. Finished up the DAMS performance evaluation tool. Will share it soon. Looking at the DAMS development plan. Joint meeting with MWG soon.
MWG: thanks for the feedback on item types! Coming to a decision soon. We like ORCID! Title capitalization - different practices on each campus. Still issues with degree names. Writing up documentation on standards. Working on rights information.
|
5 minutes | Announcements | | Of possible interest: Accessibility in Institutional Repositories https://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/12389 Carmen asked about proposing a reading group to go over this article, potentially to go over at either a project manager or open forum meeting Votes lean towards talking it over at an open forum meeting (in September); Dave is going to cancel the September meeting and ask open forum attendees to read the article before the October meeting
|
| If time permits | Carmen | |