| | | |
---|
5 | Intro + updates | All | Ask Dave about giving Eric M. Confluence access so he can add digital preservation document Dave Walker is joining us, yay! Membership moving forward June’s meeting can be dedicated to planning for Dig Repo Meeting?
|
15 | Campus self assessment tool (what Alyssa keeps calling the DAMS evaluation tool, on accident) | Beth, Azalea, Eric | |
10 | Applying the DAMS performance evaluation tool to Alma Digital | Erik & Steve | Erik & Steve revised tool Steve started applying it to front end, Erik is applying it to the front end Lots of documentation related to Alma Digital, which helps in the evaluation; Rubric will be applicable to Samvera Steve walked through a sub-collection search Plans to pick over the pain points at the July Dig Repo meeting
|
10 | Digital Archives development plan - Subgroup w/MWG | Alyssa | Beth, Azalea, Lia Ryland, Nicole Shibata, Julie Dinkins, Brianne Hagen Suggested starting point from Lia: https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/taskgroup/Metadata-Application-Profiles.html First meet up in June? Alyssa will make introductions via email Introductory meeting: leveraging what we already know, what are the possible pain points, how flexible and how structured metadata will be required to be
|
10 | Goals for the next iteration of this group | All | Tasks that are open: Hyrax test environments (CSUCI, CPP, CSUN, CSUSM) to evaluate DAMS Functional Requirements and build workflows (Paused) Next steps in development plan
Future tasks to focus on (brainstorming): Nailing down the scope and the requirements (assessment tools); Formal evaluation of Samvera; Gathering evidence to support a build; Questions to think about: would a shared system be valuable? Partitioned? Conversations around resources, infrastructure, cost, sustainability; Always going to get the question: what are the other options?
|