| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|
| 10min | Implementation Survey Results | Suzanna | - 13 campuses are not using self-check; San Bernardino is interested in exploring self-check options once live. San Marcos and Sacramento are not using self-check.
- 3M: 8 including Fresno, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Pomona, San Diego, San Jose (currently), San Francisco, San Luis Obispo
- TechLogic: 2 including Channel Islands and Monterey Bay
- Libramation: 1 including Fullerton
- Special circumstances: San Jose will be moving to Biblioteca in the next 12-18 months; Pomona uses Lyngsoe on an AMH system for check-in
|
| 5min | Fresno's experiences with self-check | Renaldo | - Setup appears to be vendor agnostic
- They have to go through stunnel to do the configuration; everything uses SIP2
|
| 10min | Goals & scope of the project | Suzanna | - Discussed goals and scope to be posted to Atlassian. Discussed groups with whome we will need to collaborate and discuss (RFID and Access Services Working Group)
|
| 5min | Survey | Suzanna | - Determined that a survey was appropriate to find out how campuses are using self-check. Suzanna will draft a survey that can be distributed in May.
|
| 5min | Deadlines for deliverables | Suzanna | - Discussed deadlines for deliverables.
- The biggest challenge is testing the configurations at various campuses without knowing when we will have access to our systems – likely we will be able to get certified and test over the summer, then provide documentation by the end of the summer or beginning of the fall.
|