2016-04-20 Meeting notes - Self-Check Task Force

10min

Implementation Survey Results

Suzanna

• 13 campuses are not using self-check; San Bernardino is interested in exploring self-check options once live. San Marcos and Sacramento are not using self-check.

• 3M: 8 including Fresno, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Pomona, San Diego, San Jose (currently), San Francisco, San Luis Obispo

• TechLogic: 2 including Channel Islands and Monterey Bay

• Libramation: 1 including Fullerton

  • Special circumstances: San Jose will be moving to Biblioteca in the next 12-18 months; Pomona uses Lyngsoe on an AMH system for check-in

5min

Fresno's experiences with self-check

Renaldo

• Setup appears to be vendor agnostic

• They have to go through stunnel to do the configuration; everything uses SIP2

10min

Goals & scope of the project

Suzanna

• Discussed goals and scope to be posted to Atlassian. Discussed groups with whome we will need to collaborate and discuss (RFID and Access Services Working Group)

5min

Survey

Suzanna

• Determined that a survey was appropriate to find out how campuses are using self-check. Suzanna will draft a survey that can be distributed in May.

5min

Deadlines for deliverables

Suzanna

• Discussed deadlines for deliverables.

• The biggest challenge is testing the configurations at various campuses without knowing when we will have access to our systems – likely we will be able to get certified and test over the summer, then provide documentation by the end of the summer or beginning of the fall.