2022-03-01 Meeting notes
Date
Mar 1, 2022
Participants
@Meghann Weldon (Unlicensed)
Chris Lee
Holly Richmond
David Rocha
Danny Soares
Christina Misuraca Dwyer
Stacy Caro
Goals
Discussion topics
Time | Item | Presenter | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
| Website work |
|
|
Overdue and lost items |
Lost: CSU+ Items Lost or Overdue | LostCSU+Items LendingLibrary From: Analytics reports made for resource sharing “A note on how the 90 day time frame was chosen to identify "long overdue" and therefore lost materialsIn April 2018 Mallory analyzed return rates of a 5 campus sample, looking at how many items were returned after their due dates and how many days after the due date the item was returned. The goal was to identify the time frame in which the most loans were returned that could also allow libraries the flexibility to replace items within the time frame of a semester should they choose to do so. The analysis included all user groups and all types of loans except item policies that indicated a checkout period of less than 1 week. A 30 day overdue window was too short, showing that higher volume campuses still had more than 10% of items that were ultimately returned still on loan. Increasing the overdue period from 30 to 90 days essentially cuts the number of outstanding checkouts in half, bringing every campus down to single digit outstanding returns ranging from under 1% to 6%.” How to help our community with the cleanup? ISPIE TV segment on lost and overdue procedures, perhaps an email blast as well. -how to clean up patron account -communication between the two schools -analytics: show people how to do reports or blast out the reports as PDFs. -help people with a timeline for a summer clean up -reformat the webpages for lost items to make it more consumable and user friendly | ||
| Task forces |
| Review current outstanding task forces and identify if there are any updates or action items that need to happen. CSU+ Loan period project: loss rates would be impacted by recent events rather than loan period. Do we need to report out? CSU/UC collaboration: in progress Copyright: haven’t met since last summer, folks are preoccupied with other work ILLiad updates: 9.2 is rolling out so it may be time for that group to review 9.2 and share their assessment. Rapido: active and relevant CSU and SUNY: next steps/update. Run analytics, reconnect with SUNY partners, and discuss how they fit into the Rapido workflow. |
Action items
Reviewing pages is a work in progress
Lost and overdue items
Step 1: Reformat web pages covering this content
Step 2: make the analytics report relatable
Step 3: Email blast
Step 4: Followed by ISPIE
Chris: style guide for RSFC webpages
Tina will call ILLiad taskforce to meet in order to review ILLiad 9.2
Chris will reach out to Tim and SUNY/CSU+ team