2019-5-2/3 Meeting notes
Date: May 2, 2019
Time | Item | Who | |
---|---|---|---|
12:00 pm | Lunch | Tracy Elliott (Unlicensed) | King Library Meeting Room 225 Optional tours: 12:15-12:45
|
1:00 pm | Brief introductions | All | Welcome from Dr. Joan Fick, Interim Provost |
1:15 pm | Positions/ScholarWorks Governance Budget briefing from Gerry? | Cesar-busy Tracy-forward | |
2:15 pm | Committee Updates
| Prioritizing budget items based on having a budget for the Fall or not The data manager position has been open
Total $47,565 Cost-sharing for professional development needs to be systematic Interest in ULMS summer meetings (late July or early August) and funding the ULMS meetings in general. 17 in favor Positions Data Manager position-(Marcus’ previous position) Questions to David about his document? Can some of this work be done by Brandon and is it FT? Some aspects can be done by Brandon and it could be half time. If we don’t fill this position, there is an opportunity for a 2nd ScholarWorks position. We need more clarity and detail about the 1 year ScholarWorks position and to memorialize this Tracy-working with a vendor (Islandora) to replace digital commons. Would welcome other institutions to work with us to get out of ContentDM Motion to table the vote until 9:30 tomorrow.
Due date in September because the Elsevier contract negotiations start in December. | |
2:45 pm | Break | ||
3:00 pm | ECC Cuts/Current Advocacy |
Overage is $470K of a 5-million-dollar budget. EAR Docs (recommendations and usage and emails about Business Source Premier) 18 yes Ed Inch-keep the conversations going and imagine what this will look like of nothing is done. The provosts are aware of the equity and access issues. 7 campus resolutions in support of ECC. Creating a memo addressed to the provost with the proposed cuts to the ECC Send to Ed and he will be on the agenda for June Do we have a document listing what is core content. Based on 20 or more campuses Patrick N. curricular mapping was mentioned last year. Michelle says there is a document that outlines what is ECC criteria. Eddie: Need to know what I am negotiating other than price Charge of the SWOT team 18 yes Elsevier Statement 19 Yes The reconsideration to move Brandon and Kevin has failed in the first stage | |
Deans Only Hour | All Deans | Elsevier Statement 19 Yes | |
6:30 | Dinner | All | Farmers Union 151 W Santa Clara St, San Jose, CA 95113 |
Date: May 3, 2019
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
8:30 am | Full Breakfast | Tracy Elliott (Unlicensed) | King Library Meeting Room 225 |
9:00 am | Elsevier Contract/Elsevier Statement | ||
Business from previous day | |||
10:30 am | Break | FY19-20 – COLD Meeting Dates (Amy) Sept. 19-20, Dominguez Hills Dec. 12-13, East Bay (working on Dec 5-6) March 19-20, Cal Poly May 28-29, Maritime Academy Motion to include ADs and directors functioning in an AD role in the DH COLD meeting on September 29 COLD meeting. Seconded by Karen 20 yes | |
10:45 am | CSU-UC Transformative Agreement | Mark Stover | UC Read and Publish Collaboration- Mark (refer to slides) Ivy Anderson and Gunter Waibel from CDL approached him about possible partnership “Transformative Agreement” also called “read and publish” attempt (builds a pathway to OA) What is the motivation? Political win for the CSUs that we are working together to more uniformly and libraries are First ever UC/CSU partnership Plow these cost savings back into the native OA journals which have a problem with sustainability Faculty Choices Probably not the big 3 Presented at CNI, a call to attention. Not spending more than 2% of what they are going to spend and publishers won’t lose more than 2% Transform the state of scholarly communications. Flipping journal packages to open access and allow the publishers to do what they do. The university subsidizes the research and via federal grants What is a transformative agreement? (slides) -Cost neutral (won’t pay more if already getting subscription Shows a unified front for higher ed in California CSU Libraries would have to do a lot of education Partnership should be dependent on CUL (Council of University Librarians). Next steps will be to invite collaborators to next COLD meeting. |
Review charter and committee charges
| ERM acquisition committee-revisit role and break it into 2 committees = acquisitions and ERM committee Move from 6 to 7 functional committees and reduce the number of members from 5 to 4. Decision from COLD about forming two committees. Scholarly Communications liaison to EAR added to SC charge (Adriana/Mark) Motion: Scholarly Communications add an EAR rep for communications and Jen’s final comments (and accomplishments) SWOT team for ScholarWorks Formed two new committees | ||
Lunch | Box lunch available in meeting room if ordered | Optional tours: 12:15-12:45
|