Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Current »

Date

Participants

  • David Walker

  • Alfredo Lafarga

  • Alyssa Loera

  • Steven Orr

  • Tessa Withorn

Goals

  • Review background research, if available

Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

10m

Example repositories

Alfredo

  • Examples taken from the top repositories out there

    • Many other sites were just stock DSpace, Digital Commons, etc.

  • Group will pick out the elements we like

  • David will create document

  • Next meeting: pair down the list to features that are desirable, accessible, and feasible to implement.

10m

Audiences

Tessa

  • User stories

  • Tie facets and other search features back to these stories

10m

Accessibility

Steven

  • Ran an initial check on ScholarWorks using compliance Sheriff.

  • Out of the box has pretty good numbers.

  • Top problems on public site (sans any content) involve contrast issues

  • Still need to re-evaluate the site with content, as well as the back-end

5min

Demo system

David Walker

  • Can be a useful alternative to the main production site.

  • Running a slightly older version (2.1) to production (2.4). The production site includes a number of accessibility improvements that came in v. 2.2 and 2.3.

Action items

  • David will give Steven login credentials so he can run CS on the back-end
  • UI group will include elements they like in example sites in shared doc
  • UI group will determine which fields from Metadata recommendation should be links, advanced search, or facets
  • David will fix initial color contrast problems from CS scan.
  •  

Decisions

  • No labels