Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

  • Outline plans and schedule for the year

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

10m

Existential concerns

David

  • Name of this group:

    • Institutional Repository Working Group? *

    • ScholarWorks Working Group?

    • Something else?

  • Overlap w/ concerns from Steering Committee

    • Brainstorm

      • Faculty submissions

        • issues surrounding (mediation)

        • ORCID/Unpaywall making the process easier

      • Transformative agreements

      • ScholarWorks TOS

      • Mediated deposit agreement

      • Journal agreement (w/ editors)

    • Steering Committee could refer issues to IRWG

  • Develop a charge

20m

Brainstorm projects

All

  • Interface

    • facets

    • lateral linking

    • main entry-points on home page

    • campus landing pages

  • Metadata

    • Work forms

      • refinements

      • creative works

    • Data clean-up work

      • featured field clean-up initiative

        • author fields

    • Controlled vocabularies

      • degrees

    • Documentation

      • disciplines guidance

      • update to match forms

  • Primo harvesting

    • Embargoed items need a note

    • Other tweaks in metadata / visibility

  • Features

    • Enhancement to collections

    • Statistical information

      • razzle-dazzle (display of downloads, etc.)

  • Other

    • NIH requirement for data sharing in 2023

      • need plans and guidelines

      • leverage for funding

    • conference presentations of our projects

      • Open Repositories

      • Code4Lib

      • Samvera Connect

10m

Metadata

David

5m

Scheduling

David

  • Meetings for the rest of the year

✅ Action items

  • David send out email to identify top tasks
  • Carmen will draft a charge for IRWG

⤴ Decisions

  • Group will be called Institutional Repository Working Group
  • No labels