Lack of information about the release timeline is a concern
Interested in seeing some sort of demonstration of the product from beta testing sites, particularly one using Alma (person at Washington State?)
Is anyone in the CSU attending the OCLC conference this year? If so perhaps they can do some investigating. (Maybe Mallory can go - she’ll look into it)
Resource Sharing functional committee discusses, drafts policy and posts to ulms website Include the following information in the review document, where applicable:
current policy text
proposed new policy text
last revision date
status (in process, approved, etc.)
Link to proposed policy text sent to I-SPIE list and ULMS access list for review
Turnaround time for feedback review: minimum 1 week. More where appropriate.
Feedback compiled
Discuss policy feedback from lists in open meeting
Resource Sharing functional committee drafts second version of policy
based on open meeting discussion and written feedback
second draft posted to ULMS website with indication of changes made
Policy sent to ULMS Coordinating Committee for review and approval
if needed comes back to RS functional committee for review
Approved policy sent to COLD for approval
Notice sent to ULMS-access and I-SPIE lists after vote to indicate adoption or veto
*This process is subject to change depending on the workload of the ULMSCC and COLD.