2018-12-6/7 Meeting notes 2

Student Success Committee Update.docx

ULMS Steering Committee Annual Report (2017-18).pdf

EAR - Michele Van Hoeck

1. Ebook pilot project - PDA pilot very successful - takes a lot of chapter views to trigger a purchase - see in the report - concern for volume of chapter downloading - maybe do with Springer
2. Streaming media subcommittee - Kanopy - very popular - pricing model of concern - PDA - triggering some concern - subcomm asked CO to broach Q of more public library type subscription - more rationed - certain number of films a month - see if we can get that - any way of knowing what our users would think - rationale
   1. Tracy Gilmore - prelim work in the spring - concern re ECC - now at CSULB - excel work useful reports because cost per use - cost per resource
   2. Underused resources that could benefit from advertising but also for advocacy - this is what it’s costing us per article - time to set up report
3. Usage stats project - not just total numbers - cost per use - what does it cost per article
4. New interest WOS vs SCOPUS - feel stuck with three year contract 

ScholComm - 3topics - rely heavily on coordination

1. Create framework
   1. Create informational website on copyright
   2. Reviewed by subcomm - see link in the report

   3. Also some questions remain

      • do we need campus faculty input before we launch?
      • contact?Want to entertain questions but how handle - listserv?  Participants from all questions?  How do we distribute?
      • do need a listserv for people answering questions - so people you can consult - but listserv not public
      • Patrick can send list of contacts to be updated and ScholComm can maintain the timeliness of the list
2. Develop and Deploy copyright first responders and training curriculum - bring back for budget discussion  
3. Support OA user and workforce education
   1. Create website
   2. Beyond the green and gold models
4. Develop and conduct ORCID
5. Digital punlishing at CSU libraries
   1. Explore OJS and its potential 

STIM and Tipasa Task Force

1. Tipasa is a subgroup - has done a great job - Illiad will be maintained for some time - Lauren Magnusson - review in 2020
2. Library IT meeting - joint meeting -
3. Managed data - maker convening at Sonoma end of May
4. LOCKSS in the CSU - David Walker and problem with storage - Kevin Jeffrey - who has lockboxes and will they continue to maintain - SDSU
5. Code for Lib in SJSU - may have CSU get together - chat on technology channels 
6. Keep content secure - mantaining our own copies of things we would be concerned bout losing -
   1. Unique collections 
   2. Subscribed content for post-cancellation subscriptions - able to access - restarting the conversation - Supposed to update what goes into the LOCKSS Box - prospective - need to stay on top of - some delicacy
   3. Two failed attempts at LOCKSS system-wide

Student Success - Tracy Elliott

1. Trying to find coordinator for study tracks study for student success - Lily Luo at SJSU - background in academic library research - practice - research design in - enhancing library academic and research skills - be better researcher
2. IRDL no longer being funded - participating campuses - we can collect the data;  Person to do data collection - institutional data folks - willing to take data you collected - identifier is course section number - pull students and the pull student success - fall to fall retention - are those good student data points - do the folks who own the data willing to share - need to get their agreement - SJSU won’t approve unless know all 19 campuses on board - reps to sign - they will contribute and approval Inst Effectiveness - done get IRB at own institution - once umbrella IRB should be able to submit to campus and get you an exemption.   Draft form and how to be presented - send out docusign - Want to begin data collection in summer - Project Information Literacy

ULMS - Carlos

1. Annual report on the website
2. Looking at more system-wide
   1. Enhancement process - make some slight changes - what are other consortia doing - goal is to ensure collective anhencement requests are moved forward by ex libris - begins in the spring - send out more requests - not ask for system-wide ehancement request
   2. Leading up to implementation issues re policies and governance ULMS - no new policies - were policies last year - not clear what was recommended and what was required - manage better page re what approved - etc. Discovery team looking at UX related recommendations - enhancements for Primo.
3. Functional committees meeting on their own
4. Still exploring how to provide training and continuing education - very well-received
5. Community colleges are moving to ULMS/Ex Libris

Mark Stover

Patrick Newell (Unlicensed)