Alma Functional Known Issues
| Case# | Issue | Notes | Reported | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 00222669 | Not possible to change the display of indexes in the Advanced Search screen | This was sent to development, and Ex Libris developed an enhancement for the August 2016 release that allows you to alter the order of search indexes in the Advanced Search. To change the display order in Advanced Search, go to Resource Configuration | Configuration Menu | Search Indexes and change the "Index Order" column. | RESOLVED Fixed in August 2016 release |
Alma Migration Known Issues
| Case# | Issue | Notes | Reported | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 00237034 | IZ record has single OCLC number but doesn't link to the NZ during migration when there is a record in both the NZ and CZ with a matching OCLC number | This is caused by the fact that there are multiple matches in the NZ for this record, so there isn't a way to determine which record the IZ record should link to. As a possible solution: remove electronic records from the OCLC load that also exist in SFX to prevent multiple records with the same OCLC number appearing in the NZ. | UNDER REVIEW | |
| 00230389 | Extra holding is created without call number information or items attached, but contains LIB HAS statement | This happens during the migration if you are using summary statements from the bib record, and your summary statements do not contain any subfield with the location code that represents the holding. There isn't a way to determine which holding the statement should be attached to, so a new holding is created. CO is working on a fix for bib records that have one holding attached. The best fix for bib records with multiple holdings attached is to include a location subfield in the summary statement. Or, the summary statement can be retained in a local note in the bib record instead of in the holding record. |
| CO DEVELOPMENT IN PROGRESS |