Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

In attendance: Christian Ward, Jill Strykowski, Corinne Ornelas, Can Li, Tim Fluhr, Heather Cribs

Absent: Christina Hennessey, Dolly Lopez

\uD83E\uDD45 Agenda

Goal: Determine starting topics and plans

Topic

Views and relevancy recommendations

Looked over table created by CH (See spreadsheet)

CW: how do we determine what relevancy is “good” for our users?
-- JS: suggest we develop and use UX personas; make recommendations based on those personas and then libraries can create and update View settings based on which personas they think are most relevant to their campus user-group

CL, HC: when doing testing, be aware of other factors such as timing of indexing, CDI updates, availability settings

Look at University of Washing(?) methodology for collecting example search data

CW, CO: look at common issues from LibChat/Reference sessions that should be focused on as common problems and/or can be used as test cases

HC: Break up chart by columns and address as different issues

CL, CW: do others look at the json and pnx code? Is it helpful in understanding?

For Group: How do we develop rubrics for both testing and persona creation?

For CH: Can we ask each campus to provide quick explanation of what changes they recall making to view settings and ranking and what their reasoning was?

FRBR learning and improvements

Group agreed this topic should be reviewed a revisited for whole CSU

Uncertain if it will improve result as desired

On JS to-do, read and watch: Understanding DeDup and FRBR, DeDup, FRBR video

Title/portfolio matching

For CH, JS: do we have any updates in ExLibris tickets or release notes on this topic?

Check in with Nikki DeMoville - ask if she can share he background information, examples and needs

OA resource tagging

For CH, JS: do we have any updates in ExLibris tickets or release notes on this topic?

Secondary resource type work

For CH/JS: check with RMFC

Resource types in general

JS: Can I give us the crazy task of documenting complete mappings for : Resource type vs. Material type vs. Physical item type in Alma → Primo → CDI → GTI → digital collections, etc.

Is ExLibris going to do a normalization project on this data like they are doing with CDI subjects?

Enhancement request to improve course name/ID as a filter – sort as full string – should sort as Alpha and then as number

did not discuss

Pendo???

did not discuss

Linked data and AI??

did not discuss

✅ Action items

  • Get update on tickets for

    • Title/portfolio matching

    • OA resource tagging

  • Get update on secondary resource type work

  • Break up into study groups

  • Jill to create

Recommended reading

  • No labels