One of LDTF main questions is how might LDTF/DAWG collaboration work when campuses are not in Hyrax/Samvera? Each non-Hyrax campus is working with slightly (or greatly) different metadata application profiles. If working on LD enrichment for Hyrax-focused metadata, should the CSU LDTF be aiming to help with general CSU standards and guidance in this area as well?
Has DAWG evaluated/know yet, what adherence to a single thesaurus there is among each controlled vocabulary element set in the CSU digital archives model/emerging data set? The current thinking, in LDTF, which some of its members could help with:
Geonames
LSCH, FAST, AAT reconciliation via API (OpenRefine currently with Wikidata only)