Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 25 Next »

Document status

DRAFT

Area coveredacquisitions, cataloging
Lead Author
Co-authors

Background

Libraries need to make collection development and acquisitions decisions based on the most accurate and current data – a necessity even more important in the CSU's shared environment. Alma’s consortial functionalities provide real-time look into the acquisitions activities of CSU libraries and the increased transparency across the system will assist in future collection development decisions. Bibliographic records are shared through the Network Zone (NZ) and Community Zone (CZ), and the inventory of individual campuses are visible to sister campuses within the consortium at the NZ level. A policy outlining the preferred method of linking order records to bibliographic records in the appropriate zone(s) is necessary to avoid duplication of records and support the on-going maintenance of shared records. The benefits and the impact of creating order records based on the CZ, NZ, and Institution Zone (IZ) have been considered. For the purposes of this discussion, digital resources are not considered since Alma's management and workflows of digital resources have not yet been discussed consortially.

Policy Statement

In accordance with the policy set forth by the TSWG in Working in Alma and the Network Zone, when ordering resources for campus libraries that are to be made visible in the NZ, acquisitions staff at CSU libraries should create orders linking to bibliographic records in the NZ, thereby sharing updated library inventory with the consortium. Resources that are not expected to be shared in the NZ (e.g., laptops, other in-house equipment, non-collection type of resources) should not be ordered using the NZ.

Best practice recommendations

With the interest of system-wide collaboration in mind, it is best for physical and electronic resources to be linked to the NZ at the point of ordering, whenever possible.

Benefits:

  • Consortium and campuses can make shared collection development decisions
  • Consortium and campuses gain efficiency through shared cataloging and maintenance of bibliographic records
  • Consortium and campuses save money on bibliographic records

Limitation:

  • Consortial needs might be prioritized over institutional needs

Procedures in Alma

As a general overview, 1) the NZ should be consulted for matching bibliographic records. If a match is found, the local Purchase Order Line (POL) should be linked to that bibliographic record. In the event that no existing bibliographic record match is found in the NZ, 2) external sources should be consulted and appropriate record brought into the NZ, then POL is linked to the NZ bibliographic record. In order to maintain a consistent and accurate NZ catalog, 3) brief bibliographic records may be created and linked to the NZ in accordance with the policy In-Process Brief Bib Records & Minimum Acquisitions Data provided no appropriate bibliographic record is already available in the NZ or via external resources.

The Ex Libris' document Ordering a Centrally Managed Electronic Resource outlines these steps, but the same principles also govern the ordering of physical resources (the reporting code field might require further review).

Action log

SectionPoint Person

Expected Completion Date

Last action takenNext action required

Articulate the need for the policy (background)

 

: consulted with task force on the need for policy; working draft submitted

: policy statement creation

Create a Policy Statement

 



Identify and create best practice recommendations


 



Where applicable, identify and write up procedures in Alma


 


: requires feedback, suggestions, comments, etc.; requires potential consolidation with ER TF policies

Tasks to be completed

  • Type your task here, using "@" to assign to a user and "//" to select a due date
  • No labels