...
Time | Item | Presenter | Notes | Documents | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1:30 pm | Regathering | |||||||
1:35 pm | Copyright lawyer proposal | Not just a library issue – one approach is to do this in collaboration with other stakeholders. Patrick: strategy to go to OGC is that they gain a lawyer; letter will need revision. How do we approach stakeholders? Provost Avila: will forward to provosts and enlist their help in advocating to this. Advice for revision: it reads more as if we are requesting ongoing training and education, versus a lawyer to prevent bad things happening. No hint that there is liability at stake. Jen Fabbi noted that one impetus for this is the limited risk tolerance the CO has that we need to achieve some of our objectives. Provost Avila said this would be good to include in the request. Alicia.virtue (Unlicensed) advocated for legal representation who understands ed tech because that is an area where we are typically limited by extremely conservative risk management. Leslie Kennedy recommends it comes from COLD - joint effort perhaps. Karen Schneider (Unlicensed) expressed concern that this be distributed among multiple stakeholders so it is not using up a COLD “ask” given needs for other support. Leslie Kennedy will reach out to the sponsored research group (Ganesh Raman), the DSS centers group, the directors of ed tech group, and the CIO group. Emily Miller (Unlicensed) will help reach out to the OGC rep. Jen Fabbi suggested having preliminary conversations with campus stakeholders about advocating for an IP lawyer at the CO (not sharing the letter at this point, just exploratory discussion). Amy Kautzman recommended leaving off the appendix due to sensitive information. Patrick asked who to connect with on COLD. Carlos Rodriguez will continue in that role. Provost Avila: to get the OGC and others at the CO to engage with this, the urgency will be driven by perception of liability. |
| |||||
2:00 pm | Break | |||||||
2:10 pm | COLD Bylaws Task Force - update, discussion, possible vote on preliminary questions | No motion today. Meeting every two weeks. Have a draft and alternate draft in work. Today’s issue is standing committees. Committee chairs are asked to bring questions back to their committees. What work needs to be handled by a standing committee, and what by a task force? Standing committees may not have eternal life – sunset guidelines. Possible criteria for establishing and continuing committees: operational nature; shared governance; one other thing..? Jen Fabbi noted that under the COLD strat plan the strategy was to create committees aligned with major goal areas. | ||||||
2:30 pm | DEI task force and charge recommendation | |||||||
2:50 pm | Greenglass Update | |||||||
3:00 pm | Break | |||||||
3 :10 | Highlights from the Committees | |||||||
3:50 pm | Break | |||||||
4 pm | Deans-Only Hour | |||||||
...