Time | Item | Presenter | Notes |
---|
1:00-1:10 | Welcome & COLD Report | John Wenzler | COLD Exec approved Chris' request for accounts to access campus (non-ULMS) ILL stats. John will share Ex Libris' Rapido subscription proposal with COLD. Clarivate refused to agree to required CSU contractual language, jeopardizing our Web of Science subscription. Student Success Committee’s recent report may be of interest to Analytics. Next year COLD will begin another cycle of strategic planning.
|
1:10-1:30 | Functional Committee Reports | AllReverse alphabetical order: | Resource SharingMet with FFC Fulfillment committee to discuss feasibility of allowing CalState Walkin Cal State walk-in users to request CSU+. WalkLaunched two new task forces: the ILLiad Updates task force and the CONTU Guidelines task force. will We met with Tim Jackson of the SUNY libraries to discuss the possibility of an Alma resource sharing partnership with them. We’re beginning to revisit a project the RSFC Resource Sharing committee was working on before Covid COVID hit which was to improve cooperation between the CSU libraries and the UC libraries through expanded reciprocal agreements and courier services. We are investigating our options for adding courier service to the UC libraries not already on the Unity contract.
Resource ManagementMany in the group are participating in the Primo VE evaluation. Discussing process for adding large collections to the Network Zone. Exploring some practices around local fields. Exploring ways to provide warnings to users about troubling or offensive content.
FulfillmentERM ULMS for r4 r5, that DiscoveryThe evaluation of Primo VE continues apace. Since beginning 2021, we have held three forums regarding the evaluation. , and two which here VE Forums DFC at: 2021-01-15 Functional Committee Meeting notes : 2020-12-18 Meeting notes DFC wiki: DFC Assessment & AnalyticsWorking on satisfaction survey. Gathering specific examples and issues around: cost usage data being incomplete performance of NZ analytics being unable to do overlap analysis with print and electronic records in NZ
Will be conducting another usage data survey to better understand practices across the CSU. Task force evaluating Tableau has completed its work. Laura will share report.
Acquisitions |
1:30-1:35 | NO_DEDUPE Code | Mark Braden (Unlicensed) | The intention is to moderate use of the 988 NO DEDUPE setting by a Library. When used by a Library, it keeps the Library’s own version separate from other versions of the same work. The policy offers two examples where use of this command is appropriate. Broad-scale use of the command would result in multiple records displaying in OneSearch, for the same essential work. Think of 50 records of __, View file |
---|
name | DRAFT202012PolicyNO DEDUPE.docx |
---|
|
|
1:35-1:45 | Follow up with ExL on Customer Satisfaction Survey | brandon dudley (Unlicensed) | |
1:50-2:05 | Walk-in Patrons Policy | Jamie Lamberti (Unlicensed) Natalya Magazino (Unlicensed) | The FFC and the RSFC had a joint meeting this afternoon where we talked about the feasibility of offering CSU+ requesting to Cal State Walk-in users. While we would love to offer CSU+ requesting to walk-in users, there is unfortunately no good solution for doing so. Since walk-in users cannot log into Primo which they would need to in order to submit a CSU+ request, the only solution we can come up with is for each campus to create a form for walk-in users to submit requests. Staff would monitor submissions and place the requests on the backend in Alma. There are concerns about asking each campus to do this and so we are hoping to get the Steering Committee’s opinion. Would it be possible to add CSU+ requesting for Cal State Walk-in users to Friday’s agenda? |
2:05-2:15 | Rialto | brandon dudley (Unlicensed) | |
2:15-2:30 | NZ Records Policy | brandon dudley (Unlicensed) Nerissa Lindsey Mark Braden (Unlicensed) Kate Holvoet (Unlicensed) | Kick off meeting for Primo VE evaluation to review the ExL process to be held on Jan. 11, 2021. Evaluation to span spring semester when regular held meetings with a wider group (Discovery and Resource Management groups) will take place. With regards to our ExL contract negotiations, Brandon prepared an audit report that shows that we are currently 44 named users and almost 600k bib records over our contracted maximums. We have a number of options to address the number of named users; with regards to the bib records, we can look at a number of options. Last year ExL increased our number of bib records at no cost. We have been approached by a several networks external to CSU expressing interest in joining CSU+; we will start these conversation with COLD and the ULMS Steering Committee in spring.
|