Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Page Properties
Document status

Status
titleDRAFT

Area coveredERM
Lead Author
Co-authorsJessica Hartwigsen

Table of Contents

...

Collection Development: The cooperative approach between EAR and SDLC for researching new e-resources, setting up trials, acquiring new shared e-resources will continue and will now also include at least two members of the Electronic Resources Management (ERM) Team to work with EAR. (NEED A POST-MIGRATION TEAM-DOESN'T NEED TO BE THE SAME MEMBERS).  It is recommended the ERM Team, in conjunction with EAR, work with Analytics to generate reports displaying sufficient overlap of e-resources to acquire a new shared e-resource or provide data that may mitigate the removal of a shared e-resource from the ECC.  (WORK ON HOW TO COMMUNICATION BETWEEN ALL GROUPS)Licenses: Our goal is to help simplify management of shared resources and that included licenses for the ECC and Opt-in shared e-resources.  Managing licenses for shared e-resources will be a joint effort between SDLC and the Alma Network Zone (NZ) administrator. 

Best practice recommendations

The purpose of this document is to provide an overarching framework for the CSU and its member libraries as they engage in both individual and consortial collection development decision-making. While each member library tailors its own collection development and access strategies to best meet local institutional needs, the document complements local policies and practices based on the recognition of the value of the CSU shared collections and work. (adapt from Orbis)  Set up
A notification process needs to be established to notify libraries when contract negotiations have been finalized and access to e-resources has been renewed or opened up to all subcribed libraries.
(need process to notify outlined -is there a way to push the information out to libraries from Alma?)

...

Selection of new Opt-In eResources for SDLC consideration may be initiated by EAR, campus library staff, or may be an unsolicited offer from e-Resource vendor. Like the eResources in the ECC, Opt-in eResources are centrally managed by SDLC.

Managing License Terms

  • See Alma documentation for details on how to manage License Terms and add License Terms.  Recommended that user have Acquisitions Manager role to edit License Terms.  The list of recommended license terms can be found in Appendix B. (IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IS DISPLAYING LICENSES IN ALMA vs PRIMO? -include a separate list of public license terms and BackOffice recommendations?)  Refer to the ONIX-PL documentation as a guide for standard license fields.
  • It is recommended to track perpetual access titles in the license.  See Appendix B for license term field.  There will be more information about licenses as the 360 Migration Project continues.

Procedures in Alma

Collection Development

ECC Workflow – New Subscriptions and Renewals

...

  • Opt-In e-Resources start dates are usually July 1 or January1. (See Appendix BA for current ECC renewal dates)
  • eResource is selected for campus consideration or is up for renewal
  • SDLC starts the renewal process usually 3 months before a contract expires.
  • SDLC contacts the vendor to request eResource pricing and license details.
  • SDLC negotiate eResource license
  • After pricing and the terms of the license are confirmed, a Subscription Memo is sent to campuses via the EARMEMO listserv, with a copy to LIBDIR listserv.
  • The Subscription Memo provides:
    • A response deadline
    • Subscription details
    • Subscription pricing
    • Rights and Restrictions
    • Possible upgrades
    • Commitment to renew or cancel
  • For new eResources, SDLC will usually set up a trial of the new eResources on SDLC’s intranet site. To provide time for campuses to review and evaluated the new eResource, the trial period is usually set up for at least 30 days.
  • Campuses interested in acquiring or renewing the eResource will then complete SDLC’s order form using the link provided.
  • Upon receipt of campus responses, SDLC will review each response for any changes noted by campuses that may affect the price. Any changes in price to the campuses will be communicated to the affected campuses by SDLC and the affect campuses will be asked to recommit to the increased price.
  • Campuses are usually given 2-3 weeks to respond to the Subscription Memo hosted in SurveyGismo in a survey format.
  • If needed, SDLC and Vendor will negotiate the final details of the eResource agreement
  • SDLC forwards requisition with terms/conditions together with final pricing to CO Procurement for processing
  • CSU Procurement creates an agreement/PO and submits to the vendor for signature
  • Vendor returns agreement for CSU Procurement’s signature
  • SDLC approves invoice and forwards invoice to CO Accounting for payment
  • CSU Accounting CPO campuses for their portion of the eResource costs
  • Jessica Hartwigsen activates the new eResource collection to make it available for campuses.

...

  • AAAS
  • ACLS
  • ACS/UC Regents
  • AIP
  • AMS
  • Annual Reviews
  • APS
  • ARTstor
  • College Source
  • Country Watch
  • Elsevier – Science Direct
  • Emerald
  • Gale
  • JSTOR
  • Oxford Journals
  • Sage
  • SCELC / Project Muse
  • Springer
  • Thomson WoS
  • Wiley

    Appendix B 

    List of recommended license terms

    The following terms and conditions of use are present in the following areas in various SDLC agreements.

  • Abide by the Copyright Act of 1976
  • Accessibility
  • Authorized user definition
  • Remote access: security procedures are undertaken that will prevent remote access by institutions, employees at non-subscribing institutions or individuals

  • Printing/downloading/extraction
  • Course Pack/courseware/electronic reserve: e.g. shall be used only in electronic form. Course packs appearing in print; CD-ROM, DVD, or any other physical medium shall be prohibited and should not be used or offered for commercial use and
  • Interlibrary loan: e.g in print format only and not in digital content, etc
  • Linking/deep linking:
  • Perpetual Access product: Archiving and long-term access: back-issues Annual access fee, or Archive Capital fee (one-time fee); members opts to purchase with hosting services by XXX, or to be hosted by the member (an electronic file in XML format or other standard format will be delivered to that member
  • Perpetual access for e-books: if in the event of an institution’s cancellation or non-renewal of an institutional participation agreement
  • Post cancellation access for current issues: access to current issues shall be available to institutional licensees following the institution’s cancellation or non-renewal of a subscription to the current issues of the applicable journal (“ Post Cancellation Access”)
  • Intellectual property rights
  • Simultaneous user limits

Reference:

Orbis-Cascade policy on Collection Development

ONIX-PL documentation as a guide for standard license fields.

Action log


SectionPoint Person

Expected Completion Date

Last action takenNext action required

Articulate the need for the policy (background)

 

8/23/2016- ERM Task Force discussed the ERM policy and procedures outline and assign a policy to a task force member. Jessica assigned the policy and procedures for shared resources in Alma.


Draft for Shared Resources due September 30th. Send draft to Tech Service Working Group Leads


Rough Draft for Shared Resource policies and procedures

Ying Liu (Unlicensed)

 


  Sent Drafts to Tech Services Working Group Leads



ERM Task Force meet to discuss rough draft of policies and see if there is any feedback from the Working Group Leads

Ying Liu (Unlicensed)


 


  ERM Task Force met to discuss policies and procedures



Send rough drafts of policies to Tech Services-discuss policies in Open Forum. Ask for feedback from working group.

Ying Liu (Unlicensed)


 

 Link to drafts on Confluence was sent out to the Tech Services Working Group.

ERM Task Force will go over the feedback received from the ULMS Team and the Tech Services Working Group. Meet with other TS Working Groups to discuss overlap of policies and procedures. ERM Task Force will meet  

Final "live" Draft for Shared Resources is dueYing Liu (Unlicensed)

 



ERM Task Force meet to discuss final drafts of polices and see if any feedback from the Working Group LeadsYing Liu (Unlicensed)

 




Tasks to be completed

  •  Type your task here, using "@" to assign to a user and "//" to select a due date