Versions Compared

Old Version 14

changes.mady.by.user Eric Milenkiewicz (Unlicensed)

Saved on

compared with

New Version 15

changes.mady.by.user Eric Milenkiewicz (Unlicensed)

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Topic

Presenter

Notes

General Updates

Eric, Beth, Steve

DAMS Update

Dave

  • Brief overview of the upcoming DAMS work/timeline

    • Dave is working on a report for COLD and will provide them with an update at their February meeting

    • Work is expected to move forward on the DAMS, either additional fact finding if requested by COLD or on design/implementation of Hyrax

Potential Upcoming Projects

All

  • Priority #1: Demo/Proof of Concept of Hyrax for COLD

    • Show an example of systemwide shared DAMS using sample collections from a few campuses (LA, Northridge, SB, Channel Islands, others)

    • If other campuses participate have a space for them to drop their digital objects and metadata; DAWG members will then work to get this content into the Hyrax instance

    • Use Hyrax functionality of “nested collections” to show an example of how content at multiple campuses can be integrated and displayed together (by topic, format, etc); similar to a digital exhibit of sorts

    • Use a Hyrax test instance set-up at the CO (ready sometime in March possibly)

    • For COLD, point to the benefits of Hyrax:

      • Design is under CSU control, not the vendor

      • Annual costs not at the discretion of a vendor

      • System can evolve over time as needed to limit platform changes/additional migrations

      • Can support harvesting for campuses using their own DAMS

      • How a systemwide DAMS can support instruction and lead to student success

  • Collaborative work with MWG on DAMS metadata schema/approach

    • Work not slated to begin yet

  • DSpace collection analysis (e.g., extent, format types, metadata) for DAMS seed collections

    • Will address when/if needed

  • DAMS documentation/testingWhat other support is needed?

    • Will address closer to system design/implementation

✅ Action items

  •  Beth will complete TOC for the DAWG Self-Evaluation final report and distribute to group for review/comment.
  •  Beth to share Channel Island’s DSpace audit with DAWG members for review
  •  Steve and Dave will touch base on the Hyrax functional requirements testing and finish up the spreadsheet.
  •  Eric will reach out to campuses that completed the Self Evals and followup with a few brief questions on size/scope of digital collections (based on response maybe solicit a few to participate in proof-of-concept).
  •  Azalea/Jamie, Beth, Nicole/Steve ( ? ), Eric to look into potential sample digital collections for proof-of-concept
  •  Eric to setup February Agenda: Self Eval Final Report sign-off, Hyrax testing summary, Update on digital collections/metadata from our campuses, wokflow/process for how DAWG can assist with Hyrax proof-of-concept creation.