🗓️
🧑‍🤝‍🧑  Attendees
Here: Christian Ward, Jill Strykowski, Corinne Ornelas, Can Li, Christina Hennessey, Dolly Lopez, Heather Cribbs,
Absent: Tim Fluhr
⏲️ Agenda
🔆 Goal: assign ourselves to topics. Come up with 'next steps' and suggested deliverables for each group.
Topic | Notes |
---|---|
Linked data group | Update: Proposal being sent to STIM and COLD for 2 new exploratory groups - 1 for ULMS/MARC and 1 for DigRepo/other-metadata - to be supported in AY 2024/25. These groups to come up with proposals for time and funding needs to train CSU library teams in AY’s 25-30 Discussion: CH: getting the issues on COLD’s radar, especially with new deans - it’s finally coming! it’s actually here! All the campuses will need to be involved. For May COLD meeting HC: resource types and how will this effect us? It' will be interconnected CO: Reference highlight is turned on at Baker - only campus doing it – pulling in reference from Wikipedia |
Relevancy ranking and view settings (See spreadsheet) | Update: None from Jill - she did not get around to sending that email. Discussion: CW: will we ever get control over it |
FRBR and Dedupe | Update: Jill experimenting in SJSU test view Discussion: |
Resource and material type | Update: For secondary resources we’re going to do one more presentation for RMFC groups and then go forward with copying over agreed upon resource types. Discussion: |
Title/portfolio matching | Update: ERM group found a solution that works for e-resources which come from, or can be put into collections. The solutions involve changing ViewIt settings for e-resource collections to eliminate Discussion: fuzzy title matching |
Faceting | Update: SJSU doing UX Cafe-style testing in two weeks to get student feedback on facets Discussion: |
Other topics | HC: OneSearch dev environment - Central package on GitHub - HC does a lot of local coding and does everything in Dev environment Other services: Newspaper search, Highlight reference, Other ideas: LibCal Unicorn party CL: Personalized search - changes search ranking - problem is that it isn’t obvious Voice search - really low - but is it needed for accessibility? CW: doesn’t think it’s necessary because the site is already optimized - not need for compliance CH: Support cases related to GTI (43 cases) - 9 times, ExLibris fixed something - 1 time ran DeDupe index - 5, fix in a release - A LOT of we can’t fix it. |
âś…Â Action items
- Email TS forum and ask if people can share their experience with changing view settings and why you changed them?
- Look into which check boxes are on in the view for each campus and what the experience is
- Christina will share her support cases documents
- Resource type mapping updates and Secondary Types - Can we used on Prefilters
- OneSearch debrief with users at SacState - people had mostly positive responses - go back to looking at relevancy
- Sacramento pods and Rapido request