2020-07-13 Meeting notes (DAWG)

Date

Jul 8, 2020

Participants

  • @Alyssa Loera (Unlicensed)

  • @Steve Kutay

  • Elizabeth Blackwood

  • Erik Beck

  • Azalea Camacho

  • Eric Milenkiewicz

Goals

Report progress on assigned tasks

Brainstorm development of tasks

Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

5

Hello, Check-ins

ALL

  • Does everyone have access to everything?


10

Revisit Digital Collections Development Plan

Alyssa, Steve, Eric

  • What is the best way to integrate the suggestions from Dave and Kevin?

  • Include risks, assumptions, constraints (review ULMS plan example sent to us by Dave)

  • Gathering local info on digitization practices and metadata schema, best approach?

    • Will work on breaking sections down and mapping them to the ULMS document (as much as is applicable)

    • Alyssa, Steve, and Eric will collectively work on 1. Communication, 3. Assessment, 5. Workflows

10

Campus Self Evaluation

Beth, Azalea, Eric

  • Project check in, brainstorm next steps and needs

    • Over the Summer each can go through this process at their own campuses to get an idea of how long it takes, how much outreach/personnel are involved

    • Maybe shoot for a subtle launch in the Fall; Package it as a toolkit, while still gathering results

    • Planning to include those who just rolled off of the committee, DAWG committee members agreed that they could consult with evaluators

    • Still figuring out how to gather data

10

Digital Preservation and the DAMS

Erik, Eric

  • Project check in, brainstorm next steps and needs

    • What are the potential deliverables?

      • identifying needs in the CSU around dig pres, scoping the solutions to meet those needs

      • drafting attainable guidelines

      • investigating possible systems (systems that can integrate with Hyrax, system that would run separately e.g. Archivematica testing at Sac State); determining feasibility

10

DAMS performance evaluation tool

Steve, Azalea

  • Project check in, brainstorm next steps and needs

    • Addresses a number of over-arching activities that touch on many of the points discussed

    • Steve and Azalea are nearly finished with the final build out of the eval tool

    • To combat inconsistencies in answers Steve and Azalea created drop down menus to standardize across answers

    • Might attempt to test assessment with committee member campuses first

10

Hyrax test environments

ALL

  • Installation updates

    • Both CSUSM and CSUN are close

  • What are the goals for this installation?

    • Need installation documentation from each deployment so we can test (a/b testing of sorts); document in Confluence

5

Other News/ Announcements

ALL

  • None

Action items

Review preservation sections of evaluation and give feedback (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aRExziub2yTAyt9pY6ltO6lwOinaFaliNILMRrpjl2Y/edit

Decisions