2016-10-27 Meeting Agenda
Date
Time
9:00-12:00
Attendees
Gerry Hanley (Unlicensed) (Gerry will attend full COLD via Zoom on Friday)
- Curt Asher (Unlicensed)
- Former user (Deleted)
- Amy Wallace (Unlicensed)
- Karen Schneider (Unlicensed)
- Michele Van Hoeck (Unlicensed)
- Former user (Deleted)
- Cesar Caballero (Unlicensed) (Cesar not available for COLD EC in the morning. Will arrive at full COLD in the afternoon)
- David Walker
- brandon dudley (Unlicensed)
- @Alice
- @Eddie
Goals
Discussion items
Would you mind bringing to COLD Exec the idea of a resolution to commend Anna? If Exec is OK with the idea, then it could come to full COLD for a vote. This could be done via email if there is no time for discussion at the face to face meeting in Humboldt.
9:00-9:10Welcome – Agenda Review
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-9:10 | Welcome | John Wenzler | |
| 9:10-10:00 | Full COLD Agenda Review & Planning
| John Wenzler | Discussion of AD meeting first thing Friday, with the recommendation from COLD EC to have a flexible interpretation of the participant pool to acknowledge the special circumstances of each campus. ULMS cost sharing: John presented a slide deck reviewing the ULMS cost shares. Noted that the only significant change is the two ULMS positions, including resource sharing ($200,000). Those who are experiencing increases are also seeing the impact of leveling the costs so no one pays more than what they were on their former system. John notes that San Marcos and Sacramento experienced a reduction once the CO signed the contract for Ex Libris. The questions for COLD: the $200,000 for the RS position; and the formula for costs. Dave Walker previewed a ULMS staffing slide deck that will be discussed at full COLD. To get the best value out of the ULMS, more manpower is needed than is currently staffed. Exec discussed the roles additional staffing could assume. There was general agreement that centralized employees are a more effective approach than hybrid CSU/CO employees. EAR was discussed. The question of the $90,000 was addressed. It was clarified that COLD didn't discuss this at the April meeting because the CO needed pricing that wasn't yet available. There was discussion about the need to identify where the messaging gets mangled, dropped, or muddled. Cesar suggested providing a synopsis of EAR process so deans understand it better. The rest of the agenda was deemed satisfactory. |
| 10:00-10:15 | Open Access & AAP Open Access Resolution for COLD Draft Revised October 2016.docx | Exec recommends to the OA Task Force that the AAP situation is now so far in the past that no action is needed. Re the OA resolution, Michele noted how useful it was to have well-crafted talking points. | |
| 10:15-10:30 | Break | ||
| 10:30-10:50 | EAR Update
| Budget: John: What can we do to help Gerry? Gale: Thinking of one-time requests is one strategy. Curt: Tie-in with the graduation initiative would be smart. Amy: thinking about how we strategically get things in the budget by leveraging system priorities. Curt: important to leverage what our campuses want. Michele: Affordable Learning initiatives are useful to leverage. Amy: the Safari upgrade is an example of something that could be useful. Cyril: Libraries can work closely with stakeholders. | |
| 10:50-11:00 | Commendation for Anna Gold Debbie's document | Discussion about reframing this as a resolution, sending to Anna Gold with a cover letter recognizing her contributions, and posting on the website. | |
| 11:00-11:10 | Draft Marketing Plan Proposed Marketing Plan for the Council of Library Deans of the CSU System.docx | Consensus that we need to discuss by email – not quite enough time to take action at COLD. Question of whether this is should be communications or marketing; this is for all of COLD's initiatives. | |
| 11:00-12:00 | Finalize Strategic Plan Documents: | Exec agreed John will synthesize and refine the strategic plan draft and share out with COLD. | |