Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Date

Attendees

  • David Walker

  • Alyssa Loera

  • Andrew Weiss

  • Curt Asher

  • Dana Ospina

  • Karen Schneider

  • Kevin Cloud

  • Renaldo Gjoshe

  • Tracy Elliott

  • Zach Vowell

Goals

  • Any questions or feedback for Dana and the external group

  • Review single-instance demo system

  • Reach decision on single vs. separate campus repositories

Discussion items

Time

Item

Who

Notes

5min

External group report

Dana

30min

Single vs. separate campus repositories

David

  • Context: The need for multi-tenancy

    • DSpace

      • In the beginning: Separate instances, lots of problems

      • Now: Atmire custom multi-tenant DSpace

    • Samvera Hyrax

      • Hyku was meant to fill this role

        • Overdue, still in-development

        • Upgrades after customizations would be difficult (compared to Hyrax)

      • Aaron’s model: Separate front-end instances, consolidated back-end

        • 25 prod servers + equal number development servers, complex AWS set-up

        • Separate design, metadata, authentication work

          • Some of this can be copied between instances, with attending overhead

    • True of other systems we use

      • Alma, Primo, apps developed by the CO

  • Single instance alternative – see demo.

    • Pros:

      • Simpler set-up, can focus limited resources on this one instance

      • Uniform design, metadata, authentication

    • Cons

      • Unknown scaling issues

      • Little flexibility for metadata, branding

      • Trading technical costs for organizational costs?

What to do with desire for digital library platform?

David

Secondary systems: Faculty profiles, open access publishing

David

Action items

  •  

Decisions

  • No labels