Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

🗓️

🧑‍🤝‍🧑  Attendees

Here: Christian Ward, Jill Strykowski, Corinne Ornelas, Can Li, Christina Hennessey, Dolly Lopez, Heather Cribbs,

Absent: Tim Fluhr

⏲️ Agenda

🔆 Goal: assign ourselves to topics. Come up with 'next steps' and suggested deliverables for each group.

See Google Drive for DITF

Topic

Notes

Linked data group

Update: Proposal being sent to STIM and COLD for 2 new exploratory groups - 1 for ULMS/MARC and 1 for DigRepo/other-metadata - to be supported in AY 2024/25. These groups to come up with proposals for time and funding needs to train CSU library teams in AY’s 25-30

Discussion:

CH: getting the issues on COLD’s radar, especially with new deans - it’s finally coming! it’s actually here! All the campuses will need to be involved. For May COLD meeting
CL: Is this more on the Repository or Alma side?

HC: resource types and how will this effect us? It' will be interconnected
CH/JS: So how do we control what the data is that is being brought in

CO: Reference highlight is turned on at Baker - only campus doing it – pulling in reference from Wikipedia

Relevancy ranking and view settings (See spreadsheet)

Update: None from Jill - she did not get around to sending that email.
Any new testing from all of you?
CH: discover anything interesting from Support ticket review?

Discussion:
CL : Change the score and and see the date range - Institution boost didn’t work within a certain date range - test title “Immense World” - boost changes when you add the date range parameter and it changes not in the way we’d expect

CW: will we ever get control over it

FRBR and Dedupe

Update: Jill experimenting in SJSU test view

Discussion:

Resource and material type

Update: For secondary resources we’re going to do one more presentation for RMFC groups and then go forward with copying over agreed upon resource types.

Discussion:

Title/portfolio matching

Update: ERM group found a solution that works for e-resources which come from, or can be put into collections. The solutions involve changing ViewIt settings for e-resource collections to eliminate
CH: discover anything interesting from Support ticket review?

Discussion: fuzzy title matching

Faceting

Update: SJSU doing UX Cafe-style testing in two weeks to get student feedback on facets

Discussion:

Other topics

HC: OneSearch dev environment - Central package on GitHub - HC does a lot of local coding and does everything in Dev environment

Other services: Newspaper search, Highlight reference,

Other ideas: LibCal Unicorn party

CL: Personalized search - changes search ranking - problem is that it isn’t obvious
It’s a recommendation from ExL, but mostly makes things confusing

Voice search - really low - but is it needed for accessibility? CW: doesn’t think it’s necessary because the site is already optimized - not need for compliance

CH: Support cases related to GTI (43 cases) - 9 times, ExLibris fixed something - 1 time ran DeDupe index - 5, fix in a release - A LOT of we can’t fix it.
Parameters to turn on in ViewIt or Display Logic

✅ Action items

  • Email TS forum and ask if people can share their experience with changing view settings and why you changed them?
  • Look into which check boxes are on in the view for each campus and what the experience is
  • Christina will share her support cases documents
  • Resource type mapping updates and Secondary Types - Can we used on Prefilters
  • OneSearch debrief with users at SacState - people had mostly positive responses - go back to looking at relevancy
  • Sacramento pods and Rapido request

đź“š Recommended reading

  • No labels