Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Current »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Announcements!

  • The call for proposals for the 2024 Digital Repositories Meeting is open! Please encourage folks to sign up.

\uD83D\uDDE3 Updates!

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

Statistics

IR integrations/ACM next steps

IR/ULMS harvesting issues

Unpaywall integrations with ScholarWorks

Carmen Mitchell

Share your Paper

  • General tools rely on authors self-submitting and providing the file (either Publisher PDF or AAM). Has a wide swath of options to integrate with repositories. 

Share your Paper: Bulk Checker

Pros

  • Checks permissions and consolidates information: Deposit statements, licenses, Journal and publisher info, and embargos. 

  • Great for identifying low hanging fruit from large databases (sorting the Publisher PDF articles that can be added to SW from all of our Faculty Publications as reported by Web of Science) 

  • Great for manual processes in identifying what is needed before reaching out to Faculty for either Author’s accepted manuscripts or permission to include files. 

Cons

  • Long deposit statements may be truncated due to field length. 

  • List may return Journal or Publisher permissions when there may be an article specific permission in play

  • The spreadsheet can get corrupted, especially if you delete old doi’s. If that happens you just get a new spreadsheet/bulk checker document.

Unpaywall: https://unpaywall.org/user-guides/libraries

ScholarWorks Toolkit

Carmen Mitchell

Punted to later:

Let’s finalize the outline so that we can start a call for folks to work on specific sections.

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels