Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Date

Participants

  • Jill Strykowski

  • Kurt Hanselman

  • Cesar Reyes

  • Irene Warner

  • Brandon Dudley

  • Nerissa Lindsay

  • Boutsaba Janetvilay

Absent:

Discussion topics

Item

Presenter

Notes

Greetings

Jill

Topics for discussion

  1. Committee and Task Force updates

    1. IDTF: discussed our first set of mappings for supplemental terms from the Homosaurus and start working within our campuses and local organizations to look into headings related to Indigenous groups in California

  2. OA editing in the NZ

    1. Per Nerissa:
      My first priority for identifying records to apply the 506 field to would be NZ collections that are labeled Open Access, as presumably, everything in those collections are supposed to be OA.  My second priority would be to apply the 506 field to any NZ Federal (or CA?) document record that contains an 856 field, as they are all OA as well.

      SDSU is now starting to talk about creating an local OA cataloging policy to address when to add individual OA titles to our IZ, and when to apply the 506 field, as well as batch applying it to gov docs with 856 fields in our IZ.

  3. Other ideas for secondary resource types

    1. Government Documents

    2. Comic Books/Graphic Novels

    3. Others?

  4. Discovery group collabs

    1. categories of ranking control (can we weight specific items or kind of material types more heavily?), what can we do to better influence deduplication and collocation, and does the usage data for facets make us feel we should pay more or less attention to adding subject, genre, and resource type information in the MARC records.

  5. Advocating for an NZ manager in the CO’s office

  6. Report a resource links

    1. Primo VE link to report content concerns
      Sorry I missed the ts open forum yesterday. (I was on a roll corralling our print periodicals.)I heard people were asking about how SF State users can report concerns about harmful or problematic content.
      We use a general electronic service (GES) and here’s our documentation and info from the knowledge center.
      https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Phf7Itgqz50wPeIuPmADzodhpg9RMzCJBETgMoBrMzc/edit?usp=sharing
      https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Product_Documentation/020Primo_VE/Primo_VE_(English)/080Configuring_Delivery_Services_for_Primo_VE/Configuring_Discovery_Interface_Display_Logic_for_Primo_VE#Configuring_General_Electronic_Services The form and statement were developed by our library’s Content Warning Working Group.
      https://sfsu.libanswers.com/form?queue_id=5801Refreshing the webpage to get the link to display was a bug I created. (Whoops) I had two Service Availability Rules that did the same thing so I removed one, saved, and the link displays fine now.

Action Items

Follow up items

Decisions

  • Will present approved recommendations to Steering Committee

  • No labels