Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

This is the Basecamp thread regarding 360 Counter migration as well as some related questions for USTAT campuses.

360 Counter / Intota Assessment migration

Posted by Nikki DeMoville on Feb 17

...


Please let us know which option applies.

Posted Apr 19

Nikki DeMoville 
Hi Dolph,

Are you asking us to choose?  If so, as a group, or campus-by-campus?

What I'm hearing is that SUSHI set up hasn't gone smoothly for every campus and many are relying on USTAT as a back-up, so option 1 may be more appropriate.  

However if you are asking for a very specific migration choice on behalf of all CSU USTAT campuses, please let me know so this can happen at the appropriate level and with appropriate input.

Thanks!

Nikki
CPSLO

Posted Apr 20

Dolph Chaney 
Hi Nikki - Yes, there is a choice between these two options.  

As to why, it's simply that we did not provide a very specific guideline on whether campuses should completely stop work in USTAT, though if they had done so that would be fine.  There is nothing more to read into this about the actual experience anyone is having -- we actually haven't heard anything good or bad from anyone re usage data management since the data was moved over to Alma in January.

It would be ideal if all campuses had the same position on this, but if some campuses do have different needs than others, please let us know and we will advise on how we can accommodate.

Posted yesterday at 3:48pm

Nikki DeMoville 
Thanks, Dolph.  We'll ask the USTAT campuses which option is best for them.  We need to make sure their most complete data sets are retained.

--Nikki

Posted Apr 21

Nikki DeMoville 
Hi Dolph,

I've sent out an email asking all 13 USTAT campuses to respond to me within the next week, choosing Option 1 or Option 2.

Thanks,
Nikki

Posted Apr 21