Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

10 min

COLD presentation recap

Steve

  • Digital archives pilot presented to COLD meeting on September 29th.

    • Steve addressed methods and results:

      • Brief history of DAWG and MWG work

      • Pilot structure and participation: Six campuses, 6,000+ records

      • Benefits: Develop once to benefit all, pooled funds/lowered costs, modular system, NDSA level 2 preservation, support

      • Development needs: Reports/analytics, roles, refine metadata, advanced search, child records, implement exhibits, improve viewers

    • David addressed challenges, constraints, and decisions:

      • Increased CO costs (larger files); more diverse content (campus metadata participation); longer migration

      • Campus customizations; limited CO budget

      • Migrate pulled DSpace content; Campus participation (esp. committed DAMS); More accurate cost projections

    • Interest in the overall project was good, and paved way for immediate priorities.

10 min

Priority 1: Migration of removed IR materials

Steve/David

  • 13 campuses (5 are system dependent)

  • Demonstrates functionality and commitment

  • Requires metadata review/remediation

  • Provide transparency of process

10 min

Priority 2: Establish campus liaisons

All

  • Provide reports on DAMS progress

10 min

Priority 3: Pilot report and formal DAMS demo

Steve

10 min

Priority 4: Beta Testing

All

Workflows to be created to manage the continued testing of CSU Digital Archives

min

Priority 4:

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions