Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. SUSHI Survey: Heather put together a report based on the survey responses. Didn't get full participation this round, though we did the first time. Almost all campuses are using SUSHI to some extent. Difficulty of using Analytics is one of the biggest barriers.
    1. Recommendations: we could do a recorded presentation on cost-per-use (though Ex Libris offers these as well). Maybe want to offer an open forum where people could come and discuss challenges and solutions? Should schedule around the ELUNA sessions.
      1. Session on cost per use
      2. Session on SUSHI set ups for difficult vendors
      3. Possible to put together documentation for setting up SUSHI, at least for ECC vendors
  2. Dashboard development:
    1. What information do deans actually ask for? Might be best to ask the people in libraries what deans ask for, rather than asking deans what they want?
    2. Can we find a way to make it easy for people on the campuses to provide that information?
    3. Perhaps it would be more useful to ask what the formerly-known-as-EAR committee wants and needs?
    4. ACTION: Reach out to the Resource Sharing group to find out what the usage is for their dashboard? Christina will do that
  3. Overlap Analysis Joint Task Force:
    1. There hasn't yet been a meeting of the task force.
    2. We may need to postpone the work of the task force until the ERM committee is less consumed with CDI issues.
    3. ACTION: Laura will reach out to Kate (chair of ERM Committee) to see what her thoughts are.
  4. Performance of Analytics post-migration
    1. Performance has improved, both in local and NZ analytics
  5. Customer Services issues with Ex Libris
    1. NZ Analytics is improved
    2. Cost per Use is still confusing
    3. Overlap Analysis with the NZ is not possible
  6. Committee Turnover:
    1. May might be our last meeting of this iteration of the committee, unless there are things to wrap up
    2. Christina will be the chair next year
    3. Call for new committee members will come soon

October 14, 2020

...

  1. Data Visualization task force:
    1. Laura will reach out to Lauren Magnuson to ask her for the task force's report
  2. Overlap Analysis:
    1. Laura will reach out to the ERM chair about forming a task force with members from both committees. Jeremias and Christine both interested.
    2. The outcome of the task force might be something Brandon could bring to Ex Libris to convince them of the need for this data in Analytics
  3. Assessment of the new Analytics platform:
    1. We don't have empirical data re: the problems with the older platform. How are we going to evaluate the performance of the new platform? Error messages? User perception? Identifying reports that time out frequently?
  4. ACRL reporting:
    1. Laura will ask Nikki to attend a meeting to talk about how the reports were constructed, decisions made, constraints and challenges.
    2. We should establish a group of folks to look at the existing reports and update them.
  5. ECC Usage:
    1. Heather will email the chair of the new EAR committee
  6. COUNTER 5 reporting tool
    1. Patrick will reach out to Tyler to see if he would be willing to present on this tool to the committee
  7. eCAUG presentation on Analytics:
    1. How do you train the occasional Analytics user? What are the key things about Analytics that people need to be aware of?

May 13, 2020

Attendees

Brian Moore (Unlicensed) (SDSU), Laura Krier (Unlicensed) (SSU), brandon dudley (Unlicensed) (CO), Heather Cribbs (CSUSB), Peggy Lau (CSUEB), Christina Hennessey (CSUN)

...