Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Local LibGuide sessions are being planned for the next two weeks at other campuses, and will adjust rubrics as necessary for each institution.

    • LibGuides are used differently, and the rubric is simply a jumping off point to structure similar discussions for each aspect of the library.

  • The four institutions that will participate in the pilot in December are Cal Poly Pomona, SFSU, Cal Poly SLO, and Dominguez Hills. LibGuide to be reviewed to be decided. 3 of the 4 institutions will have had their own local review session by the time the pilot happens, and the fourth will be a pilot of any interested individuals jumping in.

  • How to promote buy in across campuses if there is no committed facilitator? Is there a way to create a position/system? Potentially an ask from COLD during meeting in December.

    • How also to promote buy in across positions in a library? This project aims to be for any/everyone who works in a library, and there are professional/organizations obligations/restrictions. Such criticality also hopes to be and should be folded into the daily tasks/job descriptions/part of scholarship processes for faculty and staff across the CSUs. This needs hence to consider RTP processes, employee empowerment, and access to information and collaboration, with critical interest in anti-racist work.

  • Devising an FAQ about the project to be posted on here.

11/9: CSU Local Review Sessions

  • Updates from SF State and Dominguez Hills and Pomona:

    • Cal Poly Pomona: general interest, may attend other local sessions.

    • SF State: different format, maybe use google docs instead of google slides, working on accessibility, another session in the works soon. Success!

    • Dominguez Hills: systematized the rubrics to be a part of the LibGuide review and adapted for local reviews, will make a suite of Topic Guides to add more towards the LibGuides, looked at an array of language and picked out vendor language, expanded notion of publishing through discussions.

  • Meeting with COLD November 30.

  • Details for December 3: max 15 people in the review group, from four institutions.

11/16: Rubric Detailing

11/30: Pilot Planning, follow ups