Versions Compared

Old Version 15

changes.mady.by.user Dolly Lopez

Saved on

compared with

New Version 16

changes.mady.by.user Dolly Lopez

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

CDI Feedback Form

Google Form

EX Libris Known Issues

Known CDI Issues and Gaps

CDI for Consortia

Webinar Link

Issue

Status

I would like clarification that that we will continue to have the option of each institution activating their own resources AND choosing whether to go with Fully Flexible or Easy Activation. If that is the case, it seems we would want a conversation about whether we want

  1. A central office option for activation of the ECC and Opt-in resources ONLY with each campus electing to inherit or not AND each campus activating their own subscribed resources.   A decision would then need to be made whether central office (Jessica) would use fully flexible or easy activation.  The other question I would have is, if we choose this model, will individual campuses still have the option of Fully Flexible or Easy Activation for the subscribed resources for which they will be maintaining activation.

  2. No central office option – each member institution activates ALL of their resources whether shared or not

Answer at 34.40. Webinar Link but also working on as a group.

Q&A

Expand
titleAre all of our campuses registered under the same customer?

Answer (2/27/2020): There is one customer and the other are the institutions that are part of the "California State University (System)", that is mean that the campuses are under the same client.

...

Expand
titleWhat is the CDI impact on NZ collections? Will NZ collections be duplicated in the IZ? Or will NZ collections remain in the NZ and the NZ manager will have to create different groups in the NZ based on what institutions would like suppressed or not? How does Fully Flexible vs Easy Active factor into this? What would the development process and timeline look like if we’d want to member libraries to choose between Fully-Flexible and EasyActive in a Network Zone?

Answer at 31.48. Webinar Link

Expand
titleI would like clarification that that we will continue to have the option of each institution activating their own resources AND choosing whether to go with Fully Flexible or Easy Activation. If that is the case, it seems we would want a conversation about whether we want

Answer at 34.40. Webinar Link. The ERM group has proposed that Central Office/Consortia PCI activations for ECC and Opt-ins are moved to the Network Zone. Not in the initial migration but as a phased process. Currently all institutions in a consortium (connected to one Alma network) need to be on the same setting. So we will need to decide as a consortia if we want to remain Fully Flexible or Easy Active. If we move to Easy Active we will not not be able to revert back to Fully Flexible (source: [ALMA-L] CDI - Where is the Easy Active setting?)