Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

15 minutes10m

Documentation around the DigRepo Annual Meeting

Carmen Mitchell

10 minutes
  • These meetings have been ad hoc in the past, largely planned by just one or two people.

  • Proposal includes larger planning committee and longer timelines for planning.

  • Carmen will include a step for asking for fiscal support from COLD around January.

  • Mark will put Carmen on ScholComm agenda to get feedback from that commitee.

  • Carmen will ask that this be put on COLD Sept. agenda.

10m

Changing ScholarWorks/ DigRepo on the CSU Confluence

Carmen Mitchell10 minutes

  • Our work encompasses more than just the systemwide IR, so ‘ScholarWorks’ is too narrow of a term.

  • Listserv has had name changed from ‘scholarworks’ to ‘digrepo’.

  • David will create a new Digital Repositories space and make place that at the top level of Confluence.

  • Will treat ScholarWorks space a subspace of that

10m

Updates from DAWG

Alyssa Loera (Unlicensed) 15 minutes

  • Alyssa adjusting to being chair.

  • Looking at ULMS project structure, documentation

  • Testing out new self-evaluation tool

  • Investigating digital preservation, both internal to the DAMS but also external services (e.g., Archivematica).

  • A couple of Hyrax test environments set up.

    • San Marcos will make their sandbox open to anyone upon request.

10m

Updates and questions from MWG

Lia Ryland (Unlicensed)

  • Went through all the pending items on the Trello board

  • Brainstorming goals for the year

  • Collection-level metadata

  • Focused on next round of data clean-up

  • ORCID IDs and name disambiguation

    • Could be a feature we develop with Notch8

    • Could be done internally as a code sprint

    • Probably something of interest to the Samvera community

  • Non ETD resource types

    • Aaron had previously collected types in DSpace

    • Will be separating out form for ETDs vs. other student works

    • Should forms be this focused on the person submitting (student vs. faculty) or type of work (article, dataset, etc.)?

    • Not a lot of best practices in this area

    • Can always make changes later

Action items

  •  

Decisions