Page Comparison

Greetings & Introductions

Jill

Action Items

Jill

Documents from the Inclusive Description Task Force

• Draft of inclusive cataloging statement
  Approved

  by: JS, CR, IW, BJ

• Recommendation on headings for Indigenous

  peoples
  Approved by: JS, CR, IW, BJ

  Californians
  Approved

  • We are interested in getting this conversation started.

  • We feel that the CSU’s are uniquely positioned to look at addressing the topic.

  • It may also tie in with DEI work being done by ExLibris

• Request for normalization rule for incarceration vs. internment
  Approved

  by: JS, IW

• Recommendation to Adopt Alternate Vocabularies for LGBTQ+ Materials
  

  Approved by: JS,

  Discuss possible agenda items we’d like the committee to include Not approved - requesting further details on proposed implementation strategy and clarity on whether they are suggesting current headings be replaced or supplemented - the workload is radically different for the different strategies

Possible issues for the committee to work on this year

• Look at Periodical records in Alma/Primo to see if there is anything we can do about the mismatched and duplicative records that appear when one searches for a Periodical by title in OneSearch.

  We all know serials can be the hardest resources to catalog, I wonder if we can put our heads together to come up with some discovery improvements for these resources (Jill Strykowski, seconded by Cesar and Irene)

  
  Jill will follow-up next meeting with recommendations for master or weighted records

• Recommend that we

  adopt

  discuss the practice of putting what used to go in a 655 for electronic books into a local bib data field (Nerissa Lindsey, seconded by Jill)
  To look into for follow-up: Do we know how heavily facets are used? - do we use genre at all?

• Use of new secondary resource type feature - is this useful? - Nerissa to present next meeting

• Are we commenting on Metadoor? - getting involved in open access MARC record repository? minting record numbers for collocation - getting involved in Data excellence initiatives?

• Pulling people together to recommend greater cohesiveness in metadata between groups (ULMS, DAMS, IR’s, etc.)

Other Updates

?